I have another article on this site which deals with the theoretical aspects of traditionl cantilever brakes, with a detailed explanation of their geometry and definitions of various terms. That article focusses on tuning the mechanical advantage of a traditional center-pull cantilever system.
This article has more of a focus on practical setup tips, though I have provided links to the theoretical aspects, for those who wish to understand the theory behind the practical advice.
Most brake problems are not caused by poor setup, not by poor quality brakes, but result from excessive friction or poor installation of the cables. See my article on cables for tips on this topic.
The most basic brake adjustment is the cable length adjustment. On properly equipped bicycles, fine adjustments may be made without any tools, by turning an adjusting barrel at the end of a length of cable housing. The adjusting barrel for a cantilever brake is normally located on the hand-lever, where the housing exits.
In the case of brake levers which don't have adjusting barrels, the adjusting barrel will be located at the housing stop where the housing ends just above the transverse cable yoke. For front brakes, this housing stop is usually attached to the headset, or to the handlebar stem. For rear brakes, it normally would be fitted to a braze-on near the tops of the seat stays, or would use a bolt-on fitting held by the seat-post bolt.
A very few bicycles are actually supplied without adjusting barrels for the brakes. These are usually bicycles which have frames intended for use with upright handlebars, but have had drop handlebars installed as an afterthought. (Brake levers for upright bars usually contain adjusters; those for drop bars usually don't.) This is not acceptable, and you should not accept a bicycle which does not have adjusters; it is a very minor task to install them, for any competent bicycle shop.
Many brakes intended for upright handlbars feature a reach adjustment, usually a screw or cam. This sets the rest position, and is mainly used to bring the brake lever in closer to the handlebar for easier operation by a rider with short fingers. This adjustment should be as loose as allows convenient gripping of the lever, because if you bring the rest position of the lever in too close to the handlebar, you increase the risk of having the lever bottom out against the bar.
If you change the reach adjustment, you should expect to have to change the cable adjustment as well.
Traditional cantilevers used two separate cables, a main cable running down from the control lever, and a "transverse" or "straddle" cable running between the two cantilevers. The main cable would be clamped to a triangular "yoke", a sort of hook that pulled up on the transverse cable.
These worked OK until mountain bikes came along, then there was a rash of bad crashes caused by failure of the main cable. When the main cable would let go, the transverse cable would fall down and get caught on the knobs of the tire. The knobs would yank on the transverse cable causing sudden wheel lockup...ouch!
In response to this, Shimano developed the "link wire." The link wire replaces the yoke and half of the transverse cable. The main cable goes through the "button" that serves as the yoke, and extends down to one side of the cantilevers, supplying the other side of the "virtual" transverse cable.
The button has a line printed on it which is intended to align with the extended cable.
There was some initial resistance to this arrangement because it isn't quite as adjustable as a separate yoke (you can adjust it by choosing among different length link wires.) In fact, however, the link wire is generally a superior system. Unlike traditional transverse cables that curve over the yoke when the brake is not being applied, link wire systems keep all cable segments running straight. This reduces wasted motion, and allws a better brake adjustment.
Link wires are commonly avilable in five lengths:
| Code | Length | |
|---|---|---|
| S | 63 mm | |
| A | 73 mm | |
| B | 82 mm | |
| C | 106 mm | |
| D | 93 mm |
If the shoe is set too low, it can "dive" under the rim and get caught in the spokes, leading to dangerous wheel lockup.
On mountain bikes with narrow rims and big bulgy tires, it may be quite difficult to get a good vertical adjustment--the shoe may clear the tire when the brake is engaged, but it may rub on the sidewall of the tire in its rest position.
As the brake shoe material wears down, the shoe hits lower and lower on the rim, increasing the risk of "diving" into the spokes, so periodic checking is in order.
The small cantilever angle of newer, narrow-profile brakes causes the anchor arm (PA) to be nearly vertical, especially on mountain bikes that have wide-set pivot bosses and narrow rims. Traditional good practice had been to slide the brake shoe holders all the way into the eyebolts, so that the back of the shoe butts up against the cantilever arm. This is not the case with the newer low-profile models.
With low-profile cantlievers, the shoe needs to be extended inward from the arm, increasing the effective cantilever angle . The un-supported length of shaft connecting the brake shoe to the arm may cause an increased tendency to squeal, but that is one of the inherent trade-offs of low-profile brakes.
Smooth Stud
|
Threaded Stud |
Threaded Stud |
|---|
Sometimes it is difficult to get all 5 adjustments set at once, and to get the eyebolt tight enough without twisting it out of position. It helps if you remove the nut from the eyebolt and lubricate the threads.
Probably the best way to adjust the shoes is to use the Shimano technique:
Threaded-stud brake shoes with spherical (domed) washers do allow for all angle adjustments. There are two convex washers, which go inside and outside the arm, and two matching concave washers that mate with the convex ones.
Usually, the concave washers are two different thicknesses, so you can select two different "extensions" depending on whether you put the thick or thin concave washer on the inside.
It's caused by the friction of the brakes against the rim flexing the brake arms, which then slip back, grab, slip back, grab, etc. This process happens at such high speed that it often causes an audible vibration.
All brakes do this, but with luck the pitch (frequency) is too high for human hearing.
This is generally annoying, but not a safety issue. Unlike automotive brakes, bicycle brakes that squeal are usually in good functional condition.
Here are some things to try if your brakes squeal:
If a brake appears off-center, check first that the wheel is installed straight in the frame/fork. If the wheel is crooked, and you maladjust the brake to compensate, you are creating two problems where there was only one before.
If the brake is, in fact, off-center, it is often the result of too much friction on one of the cantilever bosses. Unhook the transverse cable, and try moving each cantilever individually by hand. They should move smoothly and freely, and always come to rest near the same position. If you suspect friction, unscrew the bolt that holds the cantilever to the boss, and remove the cantilever. The surface of the boss should be smooth, free from rust, and coated with grease. If it is rusty, that is usually a sign that the bicycle was sloppily assembled at the dealer who sold it. Use emery cloth or sandpaper to remove the rust, and wipe off the dust and sand. Coat the boss with grease, and re-install the cantilever.

Some Dia Compe style brakes have these adjustable spring blocks on both sides, others have one only on one side, with the other side using the normal spring holes in the boss.
A brake system with too little mechanical advantage will push the shoes against the rim quickly, but won't push them hard enough. The levers will feel firm because the shoes are not being pressed hard enough to cause them to flex.
If you have too little mechanical advantage, lowering the cable yoke so that the transverse cable is more nearly horizontal will help. If you have low-profile cantilevers, artificially "widening" the profile will also increase mechanical advantage: set the transverse cable wide enough that the shoes have to be exended inward on their bosses to reach the rim.
In some cases, what appears to be inadequate mechanical advantage turns out to be that the brake shoes are not "grippy" enough; they may be dirty, or dried out, or of low quality. Better-quality shoes can make a real difference. I particularly recommend Mathauser brake shoes, which have good grip and wear slowly.
|
Excessive mechanical advantage can often be reduced by raising the cable yoke and lengthening the transverse cable, so that it makes a sharper angle around the yoke. Unfortunately, there isn't always room to raise the yoke far enough, especially in the rear of smaller frames.
A special wide yoke sometimes helps with this. It causes the transverse cable to run at a sharper angle than it would with a conventional yoke. |
![]() |
Ideally, it should start out low, so that the brake shoes can be set for generous rim clearance. The low initial mechanical advantage will allow the shoes to move in toward the rim fast, in response to a small amount of hand-lever movement.
As the shoes get close to the rim, the mechanical advantage should increase, so that a small amount of hand force will result in a strong force pressing the shoes against the rim.
Some high-end brake levers, most notably the upper-end Shimano models with the "servo-wave" feature, are designed to do exactly this.
Unfortunately, conventional center-pull cantilevers prouduce exactly the opposite variation! As the lever is pulled, the yoke angle gets sharper and sharper, while, in the case of a low-profile model, the pivot-cable distance decreases. Both of these conditions reduce the mechanical advantage as the brake is applied.
Since the travel increases as the brake shoes wear down, braking performance degrades as the shoes wear, not because the shoes have any less grip, but because the mechanical advantage has decreased.
In 1986-88 there was a fad for equipping mountain bikes with U-brakes mounted underneath the chain stays. This provided a nice clean look to the seat stay area of the bicycle, and provided a somewhat simpler cable routing. In addition, since the chain stays are larger and more rigid than typical seat stays, the "problem" of flexing of the studs under load was reduced. Conventional cantileves cannot be mounted on the chainstays, because the cantilevers would get in the way of the cranks.
Although U-brakes were cool looking and powerful, the fad died quite abruptly when people actually started using the bikes that were sold with chainstay-mounted U-brakes. They had several serious drawbacks:
Install the arms with them at their maximum spread and tighten the bolts that hold them to the frame. This is how you set the springs. Only connnect the transverse cable after this has been done.
There is usually a small setscrew on the side of one of the arms for fine adjustment of spring balance.
Set the transverse cable as short as possible for best braking. Check the brake shoe adjustment frequently--due to the location of the pivot studs on these brakes, as the brake shoes wear they hit higher and higher up on the rims. If you don't keep on top of the adjustment, they will eventually start rubbing on the tire sidewall. Many thousands of tires have been ruined by this.
| Cantilever Brake Compatibility/Interchangeability | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cantlever Type |
Frame Pivot Studs |
Levers | Cable Routing |
| Direct Pull V-Brake ® |
Below the Rim | Long Pull Low Tension |
Cable comes in from the side.
Lower housing stop is part of the cantilever |
| Traditional Center Pull |
Standard Short Pull High Tension |
Cable runs down the bicycle's center line.
Lower rear housing stop on frame, |
|
| U-Brake Cantilever |
Above the Rim | ||
| Roller-Cam Cantilever |
|||
![]()